In all of Daniel, the most difficult series of expressions rest in the unexpectedly non-sequenced and disjointed treatise by Gabriel in Chapter Eleven, and containing reference to past, present, and future events forthcoming for Children of Israel. We engage a portion of his rambling testimony.
BOOK OF DANIEL, Chapter Eleven, Correct (11) Sequence
While Section Three, Chapter 1 through 12, contains a massive work, we quote only ½ page of Chapter Eleven’s most difficult 22 pages of symbols commentary. Gabriel translates testimony from Chapter Nine directly flowed into Chapter Eleven; he persists with an overshadowing Four Great Kingdoms theme.
Daniel’s Eleventh Chapter contains seventeen, or more, scene changes; each scene change occurs endemic to different time or tenor and ambitions to modify principal description in episodic intervals. Two hundred and thirty principal characterizations repose in Chapter Eleven; though Gabriel explicitly identifies none: all represent forces working to bring an end to the theocratic principle destined to end in the last Hebrew Age.
Exegetes will encounter multitudinous definitions enclosed in parenthesis; such ongoing parenthetic brevity seems the most expedient way to define principals and to avoid numerous and lengthy digressions explaining Gabriel’s rambling style.
We begin Chapter Eleven word-by-word interpretation and commentary at verse one!
“. . . . ¶ Verse one: Daniel 11:1 depicts Gabriel’s continuing interpretive monologue from Daniel 9:27. Daniel 9:4 institutes a beginning to Daniel’s rib-todah supplication, which entreaty concludes with Gabriel’s arrival in 9:21.
Discourse between Daniel and his God devolves into Gabriel’s monologue as he begins to instruct Daniel in 11:1, which discourse is almost a repeat from Daniel 9:1: Also I in the first year of Darius the Mede, even I, stood to confirm and to strengthen him.” Vision interpretation time is set at 521 B.C. . . .
. . . . ¶ Verse two through four, Gabriel informs Daniel about his own mission to bring vision truths Daniel had experienced thirty-two years previous in Belshazzar’s third year as Babylon king in 553 B.C. (Chapter Eight). In Daniel 8:16, Daniel asks Gabriel to cause understanding about He-goat and Ram vision particulars; where, the He-goat horn will also be broken but not before Four Kingdom’s essence rises up in an inheritance sense comparable to the Four Kings destined to rise in Persia (11:2). . . .
. . . . In restrictions prescribed via Hebrew linguistics, Can we expect cryptic though legitimized Grecia invaders to qualify as achariyth, ‘the last or end, remnant, or residue’? It is not possible! We must stretch interpretation the utmost to escape this semantic limitation. We cannot pass definition on as an ethnic incongruity when language pointedly refers to Hebrew ethnicity. The buck stops here, and Grecia definition must rest in Hellenized Hebrews. . . .
. . . . Three Kings shall yet stand up in Persia, not three kings of Persia shall yet stand up (:2). Proper rendering allows an entirely different semantic. Stand up has special metaphysical resurrection connotations and cannot indicate physical manifestation. Here we confront spiritual essence, in a heritage concept, and to basic imagery encountered in other vision linguistics. . . .
. . . . Frequent mid-sentence parenthetical notations are necessary for comprehension. . . .
. . . . ¶ Verse five: And the king (Beast) of the South (Judah) will be strong (Rev. 13:11, Second Revelation Beast) and one of his (Judah’s) princes (Israel-First Beast, Rev. 13:1; Fourth Beast, Dan. 7:7 [this Beast receives power from the Second Beast {Judah, Rev. 13:12}]) will be strong above him (Judah-Second Beast, Rev. 13:11), and his (Israel-Fourth Beast, Dan. 7:7) dominion shall be a great kingdom (11:5, Israel Beast). Seeing the difficulty insisted by Ten Ages dominated by a Fourth Great Kingdom on Earth (Daniel 7:7 and :23), an Age also, interest must realize a dominance in the orderly progression of Ten Ages in the Hebrew schedule. See more of the Ten Ages schedule at www.winterbriar.com.
BOOK OF DANIEL, Chapter Eleven, Correct (11) Sequence
While Section Three, Chapter 1 through 12, contains a massive work, we quote only ½ page of Chapter Eleven’s most difficult 22 pages of symbols commentary. Gabriel translates testimony from Chapter Nine directly flowed into Chapter Eleven; he persists with an overshadowing Four Great Kingdoms theme.
Daniel’s Eleventh Chapter contains seventeen, or more, scene changes; each scene change occurs endemic to different time or tenor and ambitions to modify principal description in episodic intervals. Two hundred and thirty principal characterizations repose in Chapter Eleven; though Gabriel explicitly identifies none: all represent forces working to bring an end to the theocratic principle destined to end in the last Hebrew Age.
Exegetes will encounter multitudinous definitions enclosed in parenthesis; such ongoing parenthetic brevity seems the most expedient way to define principals and to avoid numerous and lengthy digressions explaining Gabriel’s rambling style.
We begin Chapter Eleven word-by-word interpretation and commentary at verse one!
“. . . . ¶ Verse one: Daniel 11:1 depicts Gabriel’s continuing interpretive monologue from Daniel 9:27. Daniel 9:4 institutes a beginning to Daniel’s rib-todah supplication, which entreaty concludes with Gabriel’s arrival in 9:21.
Discourse between Daniel and his God devolves into Gabriel’s monologue as he begins to instruct Daniel in 11:1, which discourse is almost a repeat from Daniel 9:1: Also I in the first year of Darius the Mede, even I, stood to confirm and to strengthen him.” Vision interpretation time is set at 521 B.C. . . .
. . . . ¶ Verse two through four, Gabriel informs Daniel about his own mission to bring vision truths Daniel had experienced thirty-two years previous in Belshazzar’s third year as Babylon king in 553 B.C. (Chapter Eight). In Daniel 8:16, Daniel asks Gabriel to cause understanding about He-goat and Ram vision particulars; where, the He-goat horn will also be broken but not before Four Kingdom’s essence rises up in an inheritance sense comparable to the Four Kings destined to rise in Persia (11:2). . . .
. . . . In restrictions prescribed via Hebrew linguistics, Can we expect cryptic though legitimized Grecia invaders to qualify as achariyth, ‘the last or end, remnant, or residue’? It is not possible! We must stretch interpretation the utmost to escape this semantic limitation. We cannot pass definition on as an ethnic incongruity when language pointedly refers to Hebrew ethnicity. The buck stops here, and Grecia definition must rest in Hellenized Hebrews. . . .
. . . . Three Kings shall yet stand up in Persia, not three kings of Persia shall yet stand up (:2). Proper rendering allows an entirely different semantic. Stand up has special metaphysical resurrection connotations and cannot indicate physical manifestation. Here we confront spiritual essence, in a heritage concept, and to basic imagery encountered in other vision linguistics. . . .
. . . . Frequent mid-sentence parenthetical notations are necessary for comprehension. . . .
. . . . ¶ Verse five: And the king (Beast) of the South (Judah) will be strong (Rev. 13:11, Second Revelation Beast) and one of his (Judah’s) princes (Israel-First Beast, Rev. 13:1; Fourth Beast, Dan. 7:7 [this Beast receives power from the Second Beast {Judah, Rev. 13:12}]) will be strong above him (Judah-Second Beast, Rev. 13:11), and his (Israel-Fourth Beast, Dan. 7:7) dominion shall be a great kingdom (11:5, Israel Beast). Seeing the difficulty insisted by Ten Ages dominated by a Fourth Great Kingdom on Earth (Daniel 7:7 and :23), an Age also, interest must realize a dominance in the orderly progression of Ten Ages in the Hebrew schedule. See more of the Ten Ages schedule at www.winterbriar.com.
===w===
RSS Feed
